, Will lose their existential work and the role that these organizations play in the monetary market will become less apparent.
Haydar Mockudemann Hosseini, in an interview with Iran's Chamber of News, stated: "The IMF's duties are related to the monetary policies of countries and their balance of payments, and follow a series of regulation of financial markets to be followed by central banks and governments." With the policy of the fund, the work of these duties and actions will be effectively neutralized.
Ms Husaini, referring to the fact that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has a statute and executive board, and the decision-making process in this institution is not the responsibility of one or more individuals, added: Representatives from different countries operating in the International Monetary Fund can take their central government positions. The decisions made in the fund will be on the agenda, but the fund's instructions will be adopted in a group and council form, and a person's vote can never change all areas of decision-making.
"Of course, the US ambassador can lobby for representatives of some other countries and provide more votes for the seat of government, but they should also realize that the negative effects of political interference in organizations that claim to regulate relations Monetary and reform of the balance-of-payments structure of countries can eliminate their effectiveness and reduce their effectiveness.
The expert on banking affairs stated: "In the structure of the IMF Statute, members of this institution are entitled to the benefits and benefits of the fund, paying no interest in the fund, and this bill has never been seen in any place where the political interference of this right From member states.
Ms Husseini continued: as the IMF issues issues to its members when central banks and governments are required to execute it, they are obliged to benefit from the benefits of the fund as well.
He added that as far as I know, Iran has so far paid its membership fees and has been fully committed and disciplined in this regard, so that it is not an excuse for anyone. Accordingly, the Fund is, in fact, obliged to withdraw Iran from its benefits Especially getting a loan.
According to Mussorghmandin Husseini, a reliable point about IMF loans is that the loans are relatively small in comparison to the foreign exchange reserves of the countries, but in contrast to the large banks, the IMF is considered to be a lend to the countries.
A senior expert on banking affairs, pointing out that IMF payments include microcosms, since the nature of the fund is not directed towards lending to members, the yields of its facilities are not impressive at all and play a decisive role in meeting the needs of the currency There is no country, but the point is that a loan from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is authorized by the country's borrowing banks to receive heavy credit lines from international banks.
Hussaini continued, "When a country like Iran receives a loan from the International Monetary Fund, given that the extensive studies carried out on the recipient, this loan is considered to be a license issued by international banks to the country, based on that, Because they know that the fund is conducting studies and surveys on the balance of payments and compliance with that country and adopting sound economic policies, and considering the issues of money laundering and deficiencies related to the financing of terrorism, so it is easier to pay for the cofferdance facility You can Zarnd.
According to him, receiving loans from the International Monetary Fund is not so important for countries, but it is a matter of interest to countries because it is a green light to big international banks to give credit.
A senior banking expert, assuming that in order to prevent Iran from accessing international financial resources, Tramp's reiterated that the United States had embarked on a completely political deal in the economic sphere, it was to be hoped that the Executive Director of the International Monetary Fund would be politically motivated Consider the work and state that they are not influenced by political decisions; otherwise, the existential nature of the International Monetary Fund will be ineffective.